skip to content

HTML: HTML5 Form Validation Examples

The option of using pure HTML, sometimes with a touch of CSS, to complement JavaScript form validation was until recently unthinkable. Sure there have been all kinds of whacky plug-ins over the years aimed at achieving this, but never a single standard that we could work towards.

For a more detailed introduction to HTML5 form validation you can find some great articles linked under References below. In this article we intend to present only a number of simple examples to get you started, covering the basic form elements.

Before you ask, and someone always does, these examples will currently work in the following browsers: Safari 5, Chrome 6, Opera 9, Firefox 4 Beta and the iPhone/iPad. Also each browser has a slightly different default behaviour.

The 'required' attribute

The simplest change you can make to your forms is to mark a text input field as 'required':

Your Name: <input type="text" name="name" required>
Your Name:

This informs the (HTML5-aware) web browser that the field is to be considered mandatory. Different browsers may mark the input box in some way (Firefox 4 Beta adds a red box-shadow by default), display a warning (Opera) or even prevent the form from being submitted if this field has no value. Hopefully these behaviours will converge in future releases.

For these examples we have created our own valid/invalid CSS formatting to override the browser default. More on that below. That's why you may see something like the following:

HTML5 required example

Before you type anything into the box a red marker is shown. As soon as a single character has been entered this changes to a green marker to indicate that the input is 'valid'.

Using CSS you can place markers inside or alongside the input box, or simply use background colours and borders as some browsers do by default.

The required attribute can also apply to checkboxes which we've covered separately.

New text INPUT types

This is where HTML5 really gets interesting and more useful. Along with the text input type, there are now a host of other options, including email, url, number, tel, date and many others.

On the iPhone/iPad the different input types are associated with different keyboards, making it easier for people to complete your online forms. In other web browsers they can be used in combination with the required attribute to limit or give advice on allowable input values.

INPUT type="email"

By changing the input type to email while also using the required attribute, the browser can be used to validate (in a limited fashion) email addresses:

Email Address: <input type="email" name="email" required placeholder="Enter a valid email address">

Note that for this example we've made use of another HTML5 attribute placeholder which lets us display a prompt or instructions inside the field - something that previously had to be implemented using messy onfocus and onblur JavaScript events.

The above code displays an input box as follows:

Email Address:

Again, different browsers implement this differently. In Opera it's sufficient to enter just *@* for the input to be accepted. In Safari, Chrome and Firefox you need to enter at least *@-.-. Obviously neither example is very limiting, but it will prevent people from entering completely wrong values, such as phone number, strings with multiple '@'s or spaces.

Here is how it appears in Safari (with our CSS formatting to show the (in)valid state):

HTML5 email required example

INPUT type="url"

In a similar fashion to the email input type above, this one is designed to accept only properly-formatted URLs. Of course it currently does nothing of the kind, but later you will see how to improve it's behaviour using the pattern attribute.

Website: <input type="url" name="website" required>

Again, the input box appears as normal:


This time the minimum requirement for most browsers is one or more letters followed by a colon. Again, not very helpful, but it will stop people trying to input their email address or other such nonsense.

As mentioned above, we can improve on this by making use of the pattern attribute which accepts a JavaScript regular expression. So the code above becomes:

Website: <input type="url" name="website" required pattern="https?://.+">

Now our input box will only accept text starting with http:// or https:// and at least one additional character:

Website: starting with http

If you're not yet familiar with regular expressions, you really should make it a priority to learn. For those already familiar, note that the ^ and $ are already implicit so the input has to match the entire expression. Pattern modifiers are not supported.

If anyone wants to contribute a more thorough expression to test for valid email or url format, feel free to post it using the Feedback option above..

INPUT type="number" and type="range"

The number and range input types also accept parameters for min, max and step. In most cases you can leave out step as it defaults to 1.

Here you see an example including both a number input, typically displayed as a 'roller' and a range input displayed as a 'slider':

Age: <input type="number" size="6" name="age" min="18" max="99" value="21"><br> Satisfaction: <input type="range" size="2" name="satisfaction" min="1" max="5" value="3">

As with other HTML5 input types, browsers that don't recognise the new options will default to simple text inputs. For that reason it's a good idea to include a size for the input box.


The slider option is a bit bizarre in that no values are displayed, but may be useful for more 'analog' inputs. There are some bugs with the number input in that if you don't set a max value, clicking 'down' with the input blank will result in a very large number.

Here is how the two inputs are displayed in Safari:

HTML5 number and range example

and in Opera:

HTML5 number and range example

They are currently not supported in Firefox 4 Beta.

If you want to restrict the input of a text field to numbers without having the up/down arrows associated with the input box, you can always just set the input type to text and use a pattern of "\d+" (one or more numbers).

INPUT type="password"

We have a separate article with details on validating passwords using HTML5, including JavaScript code for customising the browser generated alert messages.

Other HTML5 INPUT types

Other HTML5 input types include:

  • color
  • date
  • datetime
  • datetime-local
  • month
  • search
  • tel
  • time
  • week

The search input will, in some browsers, change the styles to match the browser or operating system default search field format. You can see this demonstrated in the Search input above.

The tel input type is handy for the iPhone as it selects a different input keyboard. There is no pattern-matching set by default so you would have to implement that yourself using the pattern attribute to accept only certain characters.

The color input is meant to let you select a hex-code from a colour wheel - or similar - but as yet doesn't appear to have been implemented in the wild.

The other date- and time-related options do have an effect at least in Opera, with pop-up calendars and other devices appearing to assist with input. While it would be great to see something like this in every browser, for now you probably need to stick with the ubiquitous JavaScript plugins.

Styling valid/invalid inputs using CSS

While the code we're using is slightly more complicated, this should get you started:

<style> input:required:invalid, input:focus:invalid { /* insert your own styles for invalid form input */ -moz-box-shadow: none; } </style>

The first set of styles can be used to mark an input box as 'invalid', by adding an icon, colouring the text or borders or similar. It will apply to inputs that are required but empty, or to inputs that have a required format/pattern which hasn't yet been met.

The -moz-box-shadow style is there just to prevent Firefox 4 Beta from adding it's default red border.

For inputs that are both required and 'valid' you can use the following:

<style> input:required:valid { /* insert your own styles for valid form input */ } </style>

Some of the articles below, particularly the first two, provide other style/scripting options and solutions for supporting older browsers.

Sample styling using images and sprites

As shown above, once you've added HTML5 attributes to your form elements, they can be easily styled using CSS so that each input field is clearly marked as valid or invalid.

<style> input:required:invalid, input:focus:invalid { background-image: url(/images/invalid.png); background-position: right top; background-repeat: no-repeat; } input:required:valid { background-image: url(/images/valid.png); background-position: right top; background-repeat: no-repeat; } </style>

Here you can see the above styles applied to a required input field:

Your Name: (required)

This solution is still more complicated than it needs to be as it requires two extra images to be loaded. Fortunately, we can assume that all browsers supporting HTML5 form validation techniques will also support images being replaced in the CSS by 'Base64 encoded datasets'.

Using a service such as Spritebaker or other techniques, the above style settings become:

<style> input:required:invalid, input:focus:invalid { background-image: url(); background-position: right top; background-repeat: no-repeat; -moz-box-shadow: none; } input:required:valid { background-image: url(); background-position: right top; background-repeat: no-repeat; } </style>

The above code can now be copied directly to your CSS style sheet. There's no need to copy any images and, especially if your style-sheets are gzip-compressed, there will be next to no impact on load times. In a few minutes you could have your whole website updated.

For the browser-impaired, this is how the required input field will appear in Safari with either the image or the Data URI backgrounds:

HTML5 required example 2

The same styling can be extended to textarea elements, but won't work for checkboxes, select elements, etc. For those you might want to place the valid/invalid markers alongside the element or format the input elements themselves using borders, background colours, etc.

Fallback for the placeholder attribute

The following JavaScript, placed or included at the end of the page, should enable support for the placeholder attribute in INPUT fields at least for Internet Explorer 8+, Firefox and Opera:

<script> /* ref: */ function supports_input_placeholder() { var i = document.createElement('input'); return 'placeholder' in i; } if(!supports_input_placeholder()) { var fields = document.getElementsByTagName("input"); for(let i=0; i < fields.length; i++) { if(fields[i].hasAttribute("placeholder")) { fields[i].defaultValue = fields[i].getAttribute("placeholder"); fields[i].onfocus = function(e) { if(this.value == this.defaultValue) this.value = ""; } fields[i].onblur = function(e) { if(this.value == "") this.value = this.defaultValue; } } } } </script>

on in ES6 notation (in case you find a browser that supports ES6 but not the placeholder attribute):

<script> if(!supports_input_placeholder()) { document.querySelectorAll("input[placeholder]").forEach(input => { input.defaultValue = input.getAttribute("placeholder"); input.onfocus = (e) => { if(input.value == input.defaultValue) input.value = ""; }; input.onblur = (e) => { if(input.value == "") input.value = input.defaultValue; }; }); } </script>

INPUT patterns for different data types

URL input pattern:

input type="url" pattern="https?://.+"

IPv4 Address input pattern:

input type="text" pattern="\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}"

Date input pattern (dd/mm/yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy):

input type="text" pattern="\d{1,2}/\d{1,2}/\d{4}"

Price input pattern:

input type="text" pattern="\d+(\.\d{2})?"

Latitude/Longitude input pattern:

input type="text" pattern="-?\d{1,3}\.\d+"

To match a double-quote (") inside a pattern you can use the hex encoding \x22.

Feel free to send any patterns you find useful using the Feedback option above.



User Comments

Most recent 20 of 38 comments:

Post your comment or question

1 May, 2024

I prefer working with ES6 with javascript to manipulate input more than the traditional way because it was more difficult

21 February, 2024

Thank you for this informative post.

I came here while searching for guidance on handling input error for users of Assistive Technologies. I've still got work to do!

In regards to valid e-mail addresses, only the "@" is required. Both Me@here and 自分@此処 are valid internal (intranet) addresses.


2 September, 2020

Thanks 7.5 hours, finally found the solution to my search- how to insert an image into an input box when compliance is achieved

Much Appreciated


11 August, 2020

Our issue is the opposite of requiring a pattern, specifically URL, we wish to prevent form spamming and often get URLs entered into our forms.

You'll find that most form spammers are using bots with little or no HTML5 or JavaScript capability. To that end, you are better off detecting and blocking posts with URLs using a server-side script.

26 December, 2019

I want pattern for password Validation. Requirements are minimum oone upper case,one lower case, one number and one special character and minimum length of password is 8 and maximum length of password is 16

23 July, 2018

how to create a tooltip for that thumb down image can u plz tell that

The thumb down is only a background image. To create a tooltip on the input box you can use the "title" attribute.

21 February, 2018

I want to replace the Thumbs UP and DOWN images. What are the sizes of the image that I can use ? Some guidance please !


14 December, 2016

If you want email validation with RFC 5322 standard:

| "(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7f]
| \\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])*")
@ (?:(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?
| \[(?:(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}
| \\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])+)

Or you can look here for more solutions.

23 September, 2016

Careful examination of the RFCs associated with email addresses has been conducted repeatedly and has been proven to require the use of recursion in order properly determine the validity of an email address using the full set of RFC specifications. Since it is not possible to recurse when using a regular expression it is also not possible to create a truly accurate regex for doing email address validation. The examples posted in these responses are vastly oversimplified when compared against reality. For example it is perfectly valid for an email address to go to the MX handler for a top level domain. So something along the line of important.person@ca would be perfectly valid!

6 July, 2016

I want to code for validation form without any dilog box and if any field empty then error show the below field.

11 June, 2016

You have no idea how long i've been searching for a tutorial that doesn't gloss over stuff and give you just an easy sampling. I appreciate it!

21 February, 2016

hey i am new to making websites and i want to insert the thumbs up css style for my web form.could you please specifically tell me where shoul i put this codes in the html sheer thanks

6 December, 2014

I REALLY like the way the menu pops out at the top of the page. I've never seen that. Fantastic idea!

18 September, 2014

Great post. Been looking for some HTML5 validation techniques and this really helped.

30 April, 2014

Great article, thanks!

Anyone out there know how to adjust the url validation so that it will accept inputs in the following format: ? i.e. no need to force a user to input http:// or https://

You can find a comparison of some interesting regexes for validating URLs here. You just need to pick one and then remove the portion that detects the protocol (xxx://). But as you see, lots of strange looking URLs are actually valid.

8 November, 2013

I used


to verify email addresses and it works!

As others have pointed out, this excludes some valid addresses - usernames including an apostrophe for example. Also some TLDs are longer than four characters.

20 October, 2013


You're correct: and it's not just the plus sign (+), although I have to admit, I've never seen that used in an email address before.

Wikipedia has a list of potentially valid email formats here:

19 August, 2013

I tested the email validation on both Safari and Chrome. It's not working correctly. Typing 'nobody@no' should not pass the validation but it did.

Most browsers accept xxx@yyy as valid for email input as it can be technically correct in some situations - on an intranet for example. If you want something more restrictive you can add a 'pattern' attribute. e.g pattern="[^ @]+@[^ @]+.[a-z]+"

30 May, 2013

Matthew Cunliffe & Mike, your email regexes are flawed. I have a vaild address with a plus sign (+) in it which will be rejected by your regex (and, as I experience, by many many websites).

27 March, 2013

Thanks for an interesting post.
Q. How do you only show the fields as 'invalid' after the user leaves (blurs?) the field (or after they've hit send). It's ugly to have ready icons displayed when the page loads. thx